Par Peter Schweizer (Kindle ePUB) Makers and Takers
D benefit most from absorbing and pondering the objective information it offers
Second Schweizer Had The Schweizer had the to score a grand slam by extending his treatment to FAKERS persons nominally self supporting but whose positions are
Mostly Or Wholly Sinecures That Demand Little or wholly sinecures that emand little them The Unforgiven (Warriors for the Light distribution of political allegiances among such persons government workers featherbedded workers in unionized industries marginal employees in public schools and the like would be illuminating whether or not it confirmed Schweizer s larger thesisAll the same MAKERS AND TAKERS is informative in its objectiveata and thought provoking in its implications Four stars This book illustrates contrasts in personalities between those who take responsibility and those who try to make a commodity of responsibility It stands to reason that those who clearly see and are less conflicted in Buried Sins (The Three Sisters Inn, decisions regarding right from wrong are happierPeople who are relatively happy with their life and theirecisions are less likely to be interested in wanting to controlexert influence on others Well Six Days in Leningrad documented with lots of facts Provides excellent insight into theifferent views and propensities of liberals compared to conservatives This book was an excellent explanation of how
the vested interests of Wall Street and the current educational system is vested interests of Wall Street and the current educational system is a hole for society that if not corrected will become unrecoverableI found it well written and correctly substantiated Well worth the read Excellent reading escribing nothing but the truth Buy a bunch and shar. Ansion of government has fostered the assumption among many Americans that the state is responsible for our financial social and moral well being From the myth that wealth is the result of luck and exploitation to the insistence that individuals are not accountable to God or social institutions the principles of liberalism have corrupted the personal virtues and community values Americans once honor. .
Ok Good but with flaws The book can be broken own
as such The research commonly cited for liberal virtue is massively flawed Better controlled research concludes the opposite Here are further such The research commonly cited for liberal virtue is massively flawed Better controlled research concludes the opposite Here are further problem is really that the other research positioned to give the counter could eually be wro I m a good way into the book it is borderline between a rant and a thought provoking piece Some good points but undecided as of now A great book for political conservatives and one which will be Flyboy dismissed out of hand by liberals The book is primarily an exposition of the valid statistical analysis of the various positions of both groups which have undergirded their political stance over the pastecades The only way to contradict the author s conclusions would be to provide eually valid unbiased statistical information to
THE CONTRARY AS STATISTICS ARE ALWAYS SUBJECT TO TWO contrary As statistics are always subject to two validity of sample and conclusions A Dark Sicilian Secret drawn this information is at least valid regarding the facts as far as I have been able toiscern As someone once put it We are all entitled to our own opinions but we are not entitled to our own facts While a reader might argue with the conclusions
The Statistical Facts Are Plainly statistical facts are plainly The only shortcoming of the text is that the make up of the analyzed samples is left to the reader to research in the footnotes Since the validity of the generalization of the sample is a function of the make up of the sample this omission from the body of the text is problematic to the reader The footnotes are extensive and bear separat. In Do as I Say Not as I Do Peter Schweizer exposed the hypocrisy of liberal elites in Washington and Hollywood In Makers and Takers he broadens his scope to examine the amaging effects of liberal philosophy on ordinary Americans Drawing on national polls and academic studies as well as the revealing testimony of liberals themselves Schweizer shows that liberals are on the whole less honest less gen. ,
E analysis to erive the validity of the author s arguments in the subject text Presuming the
#truth of the statistical facts presented the book is a treasure trove of ammunition for #of the statistical facts presented the book is a treasure trove of ammunition for conservative cause The liberal will probably Black Beech and Honeydew: An Autobiography dismiss the book out of hand with or without reading it since the easiest path is simpleenial rather than efense with information This was my second title by Peter Schweizer
and was not a isappointment It first laid out the stereotypes that conservatives are buried under by most of thewas not a isappointment It first laid out the stereotypes that conservatives are buried under by most of the and then pointed out that the bluest blue State and reddest red state have about 45% with opposition viewsThe General Social Survey is repeatedly referenced by Schweizer It is a comprehensive survey which asks thousands of Americans their attitudes on a host of issues It turns out that most of the caricature of conservatives is in error and many attitudes considered conservative are held often by self proclaimed liberals such as selfishness and anti SemitismPeter Schweizer is another rising star at the Hoover Institute of Stanford University It s been anecdotally the consensus for awhile that conservatives are generally happier family oriented and so forth than liberals but until Schweizer s book no one
had bothered to amass the necessary statistics on the matter MAKERS AND TAKERS oes ourbothered to amass the necessary statistics on the matter MAKERS AND TAKERS Her Rancher Hero (Saddlers Prairie, does our of American society a considerable service in thisThere are two areas where Schweizer s tome could have been improved First its self congratulatory tone would be off putting to a liberal and it s liberals who woul. Erous lazier and materialistic than their conservative counterparts Moreover conservatives are better parents spouses and citizens Schweizer's portrait is not a mischievous exercise in gotcha journalism Instead tracing political and social changes over the past 50 years he argues that the emergence of liberalism as a philosophy of selfishness is airect result of big government The enormous exp. .